<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Pie charts on FromDual GmbH</title><link>https://www.fromdual.com/blog/mysql-out-in-the-wild/comment-214/</link><description>Recent content in Pie charts on FromDual GmbH</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-GB</language><managingEditor>oli.sennhauser@fromdual.com (Oli Sennhauser)</managingEditor><webMaster>oli.sennhauser@fromdual.com (Oli Sennhauser)</webMaster><copyright>© FromDual GmbH</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:10:12 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.fromdual.com/blog/mysql-out-in-the-wild/comment-214/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Pie charts</title><link>https://www.fromdual.com/blog/mysql-out-in-the-wild/comment-214/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:10:12 +0200</pubDate><author>oli.sennhauser@fromdual.com (Oli Sennhauser)</author><guid>https://www.fromdual.com/blog/mysql-out-in-the-wild/comment-214/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the post, interesting insights.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just one remark: recently I bumped into an article that argues why Pie charts are bad - esp. &amp;ldquo;fancy&amp;rdquo; 3D ones. When I started reading it, I didn&amp;rsquo;t think I&amp;rsquo;d be convinced, but after seeing the examples in the article I changed my mind. When I was trying to read the Pie charts in this articles I had an immediate recollection - it&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;really hard&lt;/em&gt; to estimate the size of the Pie slices when they are oddly sized, in particular the smaller ones.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s a good thing that you still also print the actual figures, but in that case the Pie charts are redundant and distracting. If you have same time, please read &lt;a href="http://www.perceptualedge.com/articles/08-21-07.pdf"&gt;http://www.perceptualedge.com/articles/08-21-07.pdf&lt;/a&gt; - it&amp;rsquo;s really insightful IMO.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>