<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Flash on FromDual GmbH</title><link>https://www.fromdual.com/tags/flash/</link><description>Recent content in Flash on FromDual GmbH</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-GB</language><managingEditor>oli.sennhauser@fromdual.com (Oli Sennhauser)</managingEditor><webMaster>oli.sennhauser@fromdual.com (Oli Sennhauser)</webMaster><copyright>© FromDual GmbH</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.fromdual.com/tags/flash/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>SATA Flash Solid State Disk up to 160 Gbyte announced!</title><link>https://www.fromdual.com/blog/sata-flash-solid-state-disk-annonced/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate><author>oli.sennhauser@fromdual.com (Oli Sennhauser)</author><guid>https://www.fromdual.com/blog/sata-flash-solid-state-disk-annonced/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The price for a 160 Gbyte disk will be around USD 15'000. This is still a bit expensive. But the access time is around 0.5 ms (both for reading and writing) which is around 10 times faster than a normal 15'000 rpm SCSI disk! The disk has NO cache because it is a cache itself (according to the supplier. Maybe this will change in the future). And the lifetime of a cell is &amp;gt; 5 mio writes. For the same performance one needs usually an array of around 10 disks. If your database is heavily write-I/O bound you should consider this solution.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>