<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Slave on FromDual GmbH</title><link>https://www.fromdual.com/tags/slave/</link><description>Recent content in Slave on FromDual GmbH</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-GB</language><managingEditor>oli.sennhauser@fromdual.com (Oli Sennhauser)</managingEditor><webMaster>oli.sennhauser@fromdual.com (Oli Sennhauser)</webMaster><copyright>© FromDual GmbH</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 08:31:19 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.fromdual.com/tags/slave/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How the Lack of a Primary Key May Effectively Stop the Slave</title><link>https://www.fromdual.com/blog/how-the-lack-of-a-primary-key-may-effectively-stop-the-slave/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 09:50:52 +0000</pubDate><author>oli.sennhauser@fromdual.com (Oli Sennhauser)</author><guid>https://www.fromdual.com/blog/how-the-lack-of-a-primary-key-may-effectively-stop-the-slave/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Most (relational) DBAs and DB application developers know the concept of a primary key (&amp;ldquo;PK&amp;rdquo;) and what it is good for. However, much too often one still encounters table definitions without a PK. True, the relational theory based on sets does not need a PK, and all operations (insert, select, update, delete) can also be done on tables for which no PK was defined. If performance doesn&amp;rsquo;t matter (or the data volume is small, a typical situation in tests), the lack of a PK does not immediately cause negative consequences.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Replication channel failover with Galera Cluster for MySQL</title><link>https://www.fromdual.com/blog/replication-channel-fail-over-with-galera-cluster-for-mysql/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:05:38 +0000</pubDate><author>oli.sennhauser@fromdual.com (Oli Sennhauser)</author><guid>https://www.fromdual.com/blog/replication-channel-fail-over-with-galera-cluster-for-mysql/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes it could be desirable to replicate from a Galera Cluster to a single MySQL slave or to an other Galera Cluster. Reasons for this measure could be:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>MySQL Multi-Master – Single-Slave – Replication (Episode 2)</title><link>https://www.fromdual.com/blog/mysql-multi-master-single-slave/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate><author>oli.sennhauser@fromdual.com (Oli Sennhauser)</author><guid>https://www.fromdual.com/blog/mysql-multi-master-single-slave/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the features that make MySQL so great is its easy replication set-up. If you are experienced and know-how to do it, it takes you about 15 minutes to set-up a slave. What you have in the end is a replication from one master to one or several slaves. So you can build a top-down data stream pyramid and spread your data on many slaves.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>MySQL Multi-Master - Single-Slave - Replication</title><link>https://www.fromdual.com/blog/mysql-multi-master-single-slave-replication/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate><author>oli.sennhauser@fromdual.com (Oli Sennhauser)</author><guid>https://www.fromdual.com/blog/mysql-multi-master-single-slave-replication/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;MySQL provides its replication for High Availability (HA) and for read Scale-out. Generally it is known that in a MySQL replication you can only replicate from one Master to many slaves. In this &lt;a href="https://www.fromdual.com/sites/default/files/mm-single-slave-repl.pdf"&gt;paper&lt;/a&gt; it is shown how a set-up can look like to replicate from two masters to one slave.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>